<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391422</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in invoking section 263 without establishing the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found that the conditions for invoking section 263 were not met as the Assessing Officer had conducted necessary inquiries. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, and restored the assessment order passed by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:13:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601658" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1035 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391422</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax erred in invoking section 263 without establishing the assessment order as erroneous and prejudicial to revenue. The Tribunal found that the conditions for invoking section 263 were not met as the Assessing Officer had conducted necessary inquiries. The Tribunal allowed the appeal, quashed the PCIT&#039;s order, and restored the assessment order passed by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391422</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>