<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1032 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391419</link>
    <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee on key issues including the allocation of royalty payments, treatment of customer advances, and the nature of excise duty refunds. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer for recomputation based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and the Tribunal&#039;s previous rulings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:12:43 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601655" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1032 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391419</link>
      <description>The Tribunal consistently ruled in favor of the assessee on key issues including the allocation of royalty payments, treatment of customer advances, and the nature of excise duty refunds. The appeals were partly allowed for statistical purposes, with specific directions to the Assessing Officer for recomputation based on the Tribunal&#039;s findings. The Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, upholding the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions and the Tribunal&#039;s previous rulings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391419</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>