https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391418 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal by excluding unsuitable comparables and deleting the ad hoc disallowance of management fee expenses. However, it upheld the disallowance of the insurance premium reimbursement and denied the benefit of the +/- 5% range adjustment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the Section 10B deduction for the Chennai unit. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 28 Jan 2020 09:29:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391418 The Tribunal partly allowed the assessee's appeal by excluding unsuitable comparables and deleting the ad hoc disallowance of management fee expenses. However, it upheld the disallowance of the insurance premium reimbursement and denied the benefit of the +/- 5% range adjustment. The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue's appeal, affirming the CIT(A)'s decision to allow the Section 10B deduction for the Chennai unit. Case-Laws Income Tax Wed, 22 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391418