<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391417</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeals, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-evaluate the selection and rejection of comparables, reapply quantitative filters correctly, consider appropriate operating margins and idle capacity adjustments, and account for differences in risk profiles. The Tribunal emphasized the need for consistency and accuracy in benchmarking international transactions for transfer pricing purposes.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 28 Jan 2020 10:08:59 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601652" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1030 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391417</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the taxpayer&#039;s appeals, directing the Transfer Pricing Officer (TPO) to re-evaluate the selection and rejection of comparables, reapply quantitative filters correctly, consider appropriate operating margins and idle capacity adjustments, and account for differences in risk profiles. The Tribunal emphasized the need for consistency and accuracy in benchmarking international transactions for transfer pricing purposes.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391417</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>