<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1990 (2) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21163</link>
    <description>For fair market value under section 55(2) of the Income-tax Act, the surplus mentioned in the Life Insurance Corporation compensation scheme is only a valuation factor; it is not to be treated as an independent surplus payable beyond market value. The note also states that a running business can itself be a capital asset capable of improvement after 1 January 1954 under section 55(1)(b), and that increased business activity and assessed profits may support such a finding even without any change in share capital. On that record, a Tribunal&#039;s estimate of improvement cost may be upheld as a reasonable factual inference if supported by evidence.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 15:07:38 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60162" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1990 (2) TMI 4 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21163</link>
      <description>For fair market value under section 55(2) of the Income-tax Act, the surplus mentioned in the Life Insurance Corporation compensation scheme is only a valuation factor; it is not to be treated as an independent surplus payable beyond market value. The note also states that a running business can itself be a capital asset capable of improvement after 1 January 1954 under section 55(1)(b), and that increased business activity and assessed profits may support such a finding even without any change in share capital. On that record, a Tribunal&#039;s estimate of improvement cost may be upheld as a reasonable factual inference if supported by evidence.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 20 Feb 1990 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21163</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>