https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285801 A successor State's claim to power from the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects was held to be justiciable under Article 131, because Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 preserved rights and liabilities in the projects and no final inter se agreement was proved. The Court found no bar of limitation, Article 363, or Article 262, and held that pre-merger Bilaspur rights alone could not sustain the claim. The plaintiff was denied 12% free power, but was recognised as entitled to 7.19% of the composite Punjab share, with consequential monetary computation and interest on amounts due. en-us Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jan 2020 16:38:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285801 A successor State's claim to power from the Bhakra-Nangal and Beas Projects was held to be justiciable under Article 131, because Section 78 of the Punjab Reorganisation Act, 1966 preserved rights and liabilities in the projects and no final inter se agreement was proved. The Court found no bar of limitation, Article 363, or Article 262, and held that pre-merger Bilaspur rights alone could not sustain the claim. The plaintiff was denied 12% free power, but was recognised as entitled to 7.19% of the composite Punjab share, with consequential monetary computation and interest on amounts due. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 27 Sep 2011 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285801