https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285795 Section 19(3)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 imposes an express bar on courts staying proceedings under the Act on grounds other than the limited sanction-related ground stated in the provision. That prohibition is comprehensive and is not confined to revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The High Court's inherent power under Section 482 cannot override this statutory restriction. The provision is directed at expediting corruption trials and preventing delay through stay orders, so the bar against stay of proceedings applies fully. en-us Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 27 Jan 2020 10:11:23 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285795 Section 19(3)(c) of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 imposes an express bar on courts staying proceedings under the Act on grounds other than the limited sanction-related ground stated in the provision. That prohibition is comprehensive and is not confined to revisional jurisdiction under Section 397 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973. The High Court's inherent power under Section 482 cannot override this statutory restriction. The provision is directed at expediting corruption trials and preventing delay through stay orders, so the bar against stay of proceedings applies fully. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 25 Sep 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285795