<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 999 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391386</link>
    <description>The Arrears Category under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was unavailable because the tax dues had not been assessed and adjudication remained pending. The Scheme, being beneficial legislation, was to be construed liberally to advance its object. On the material before the Court, the Revenue ed that the petitioners could instead proceed under the Voluntary Disclosure Category and assured consideration of the application despite objections arising from the form or particular columns. The claimed statutory block was therefore not sustainable, and the claim was to be processed under the Voluntary Disclosure Category in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 05 Nov 2020 10:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601574" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 999 - KARNATAKA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391386</link>
      <description>The Arrears Category under the Sabka Vishwas (Legacy Dispute Resolution) Scheme, 2019 was unavailable because the tax dues had not been assessed and adjudication remained pending. The Scheme, being beneficial legislation, was to be construed liberally to advance its object. On the material before the Court, the Revenue ed that the petitioners could instead proceed under the Voluntary Disclosure Category and assured consideration of the application despite objections arising from the form or particular columns. The claimed statutory block was therefore not sustainable, and the claim was to be processed under the Voluntary Disclosure Category in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 14 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391386</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>