<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 998 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391385</link>
    <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, determining that the additional disclosure of Rs. 12 Crore was not a fresh disclosure but an extension of the initial one. The court found that the Commission followed proper procedures and did not err in accepting the additional disclosure. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions without costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2020 17:18:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601572" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 998 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391385</link>
      <description>The court upheld the Settlement Commission&#039;s order, determining that the additional disclosure of Rs. 12 Crore was not a fresh disclosure but an extension of the initial one. The court found that the Commission followed proper procedures and did not err in accepting the additional disclosure. Consequently, the court dismissed the petitions without costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391385</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>