<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391381</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both A.Y. 2008-09 and A.Y. 2011-12, quashing the assessments due to invalid jurisdiction under Section 147. It directed the Assessing Officer to accept the actual rental receipts as the Annual Lettable Value of the property and did not adjudicate on other grounds of appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 27 Jan 2020 05:33:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601567" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 994 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391381</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeals for both A.Y. 2008-09 and A.Y. 2011-12, quashing the assessments due to invalid jurisdiction under Section 147. It directed the Assessing Officer to accept the actual rental receipts as the Annual Lettable Value of the property and did not adjudicate on other grounds of appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391381</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>