<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (4) TMI 1782 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285783</link>
    <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the presence of a pre-existing dispute and the necessity for account reconciliation. The decision highlighted that these findings should not impact the applicant&#039;s rights in other forums, with the order to be communicated to the involved parties.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601535" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (4) TMI 1782 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, PRINCIPAL BENCH, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285783</link>
      <description>The Tribunal rejected the application under Section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, citing the presence of a pre-existing dispute and the necessity for account reconciliation. The decision highlighted that these findings should not impact the applicant&#039;s rights in other forums, with the order to be communicated to the involved parties.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 24 Apr 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285783</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>