<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (10) TMI 1508 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285781</link>
    <description>The petition under Sections 241 and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking relief from oppressive acts by majority shareholders, resulted in the parties agreeing to resolve the matter through the purchase of petitioners&#039; shares by the respondents at a value determined by an Independent Valuer. The consent terms included the appointment of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited as the Independent Valuer to conduct the valuation within ten weeks, with further directions for submission of the valuation report to the Tribunal for binding resolution. The Tribunal scheduled a follow-up hearing to address the valuation report and subsequent orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 26 Jan 2020 08:27:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601533" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (10) TMI 1508 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285781</link>
      <description>The petition under Sections 241 and 244 of the Companies Act, 2013, seeking relief from oppressive acts by majority shareholders, resulted in the parties agreeing to resolve the matter through the purchase of petitioners&#039; shares by the respondents at a value determined by an Independent Valuer. The consent terms included the appointment of Deloitte Touche Tohmatsu Limited as the Independent Valuer to conduct the valuation within ten weeks, with further directions for submission of the valuation report to the Tribunal for binding resolution. The Tribunal scheduled a follow-up hearing to address the valuation report and subsequent orders.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 12 Oct 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285781</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>