<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 966 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391353</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the AO for a fresh assessment. The AO is directed to verify all the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee and adjudicate the issue on merits in accordance with the law, giving proper opportunity to the assessee to be heard. The onus is on the assessee to prove that the sale transaction was a sham.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 13 Mar 2020 17:29:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601503" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 966 - ITAT CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391353</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, remitting the matter back to the AO for a fresh assessment. The AO is directed to verify all the evidence and explanations provided by the assessee and adjudicate the issue on merits in accordance with the law, giving proper opportunity to the assessee to be heard. The onus is on the assessee to prove that the sale transaction was a sham.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391353</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>