<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 956 - ITAT PUNE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391343</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that payments by the Joint Venture to its members were not sub-contracts and thus not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Consequently, the addition under Section 40(a)(ia) was correctly deleted by the CIT(A). The decision aligned with previous rulings in the assessee&#039;s cases for earlier years, establishing a consistent legal stance on the issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 12:00:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601490" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 956 - ITAT PUNE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391343</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming that payments by the Joint Venture to its members were not sub-contracts and thus not subject to TDS under Section 194C. Consequently, the addition under Section 40(a)(ia) was correctly deleted by the CIT(A). The decision aligned with previous rulings in the assessee&#039;s cases for earlier years, establishing a consistent legal stance on the issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391343</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>