https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285777 Reasonable diligence and good faith in pursuing a mistaken procedural remedy may amount to sufficient cause under the Limitation Act, so time spent in review proceedings can justify condonation of delay where the appeal is otherwise within the ordinary limitation period. The text also states that the power to remove abatement under the Civil Procedure Code, 1882 extends to abatement arising from failure to substitute parties on the death of a defendant as well as a plaintiff. On the facts noted, the ex parte abatement order was criticised as unjustified, and the order setting aside abatement was upheld. en-us Thu, 19 Jul 1917 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jan 2020 13:40:29 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285777 Reasonable diligence and good faith in pursuing a mistaken procedural remedy may amount to sufficient cause under the Limitation Act, so time spent in review proceedings can justify condonation of delay where the appeal is otherwise within the ordinary limitation period. The text also states that the power to remove abatement under the Civil Procedure Code, 1882 extends to abatement arising from failure to substitute parties on the death of a defendant as well as a plaintiff. On the facts noted, the ex parte abatement order was criticised as unjustified, and the order setting aside abatement was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Jul 1917 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285777