<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 943 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391330</link>
    <description>A post graduate diploma run by a private university under the Haryana Private Universities Act, with State Government authorisation to start the course, was treated as education forming part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by law. On that basis, service tax was held not payable on the course fees and the educational exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax was available. The demand also failed on limitation because the relevant facts were already within the department&#039;s knowledge and the record did not support suppression, so the extended period could not be invoked. With no tax liability, the penalty also could not survive.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 19 Nov 2020 13:45:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601461" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 943 - CESTAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391330</link>
      <description>A post graduate diploma run by a private university under the Haryana Private Universities Act, with State Government authorisation to start the course, was treated as education forming part of a curriculum for obtaining a qualification recognised by law. On that basis, service tax was held not payable on the course fees and the educational exemption under Notification No. 25/2012-Service Tax was available. The demand also failed on limitation because the relevant facts were already within the department&#039;s knowledge and the record did not support suppression, so the extended period could not be invoked. With no tax liability, the penalty also could not survive.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 24 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391330</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>