https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391329 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties. The appellant was granted exemption under Notification No.6/2006-CE for the fabrication of armored vehicles, with the bulletproofing activity classified under works contract service. The demand for service tax on renting of immovable property service was dismissed due to the absence of remuneration received by the appellant. en-us Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:35:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391329 The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the demands and penalties. The appellant was granted exemption under Notification No.6/2006-CE for the fabrication of armored vehicles, with the bulletproofing activity classified under works contract service. The demand for service tax on renting of immovable property service was dismissed due to the absence of remuneration received by the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Tue, 21 May 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391329