<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 937 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391324</link>
    <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that freight charges constitute part of the sale price under section 2(u) of the Act, 1994. It held that the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated under section 28 of the Act, 1994, based on audit objections. The issue of shifting the tax liability to the respondent-BSP was not addressed in the proceedings, leaving it open for potential future litigation.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 10:14:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601445" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 937 - CHHATTISGARH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391324</link>
      <description>The court dismissed the appeals, affirming that freight charges constitute part of the sale price under section 2(u) of the Act, 1994. It held that the reassessment proceedings were validly initiated under section 28 of the Act, 1994, based on audit objections. The issue of shifting the tax liability to the respondent-BSP was not addressed in the proceedings, leaving it open for potential future litigation.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 25 Jul 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391324</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>