https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391321 The High Court upheld the revisional court's decision allowing the respondent to present secondary evidence of the misplaced original postal receipt and envelope. The court emphasized the admissibility of secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Evidence Act when the original documents are unavailable despite best efforts. It concluded that the revisional court's order was justified, ensuring the protection of the petitioners' rights during the admission of secondary evidence and maintaining a fair trial process. en-us Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jan 2020 09:54:34 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391321 The High Court upheld the revisional court's decision allowing the respondent to present secondary evidence of the misplaced original postal receipt and envelope. The court emphasized the admissibility of secondary evidence under Section 65 of the Evidence Act when the original documents are unavailable despite best efforts. It concluded that the revisional court's order was justified, ensuring the protection of the petitioners' rights during the admission of secondary evidence and maintaining a fair trial process. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 16 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391321