https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285770 Amalgamation of two allotted plots did not, without proof of sub-division, a second dwelling house, or non-residential use, establish breach of the lease-cum-sale condition prohibiting such conduct. Incomplete construction and deviations from the sanctioned plan also did not amount to a present, irremediable breach, because corrective changes remained possible before completion and occupancy certification. The Supreme Court further held that the High Court should not have quashed the sanctioned plans or compelled the BDA to act for forfeiture or resumption when the statutory authority retained the first-instance discretion to decide breach proceedings after notice and hearing. The appeals were allowed and the High Court judgment was set aside. en-us Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:41:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285770 Amalgamation of two allotted plots did not, without proof of sub-division, a second dwelling house, or non-residential use, establish breach of the lease-cum-sale condition prohibiting such conduct. Incomplete construction and deviations from the sanctioned plan also did not amount to a present, irremediable breach, because corrective changes remained possible before completion and occupancy certification. The Supreme Court further held that the High Court should not have quashed the sanctioned plans or compelled the BDA to act for forfeiture or resumption when the statutory authority retained the first-instance discretion to decide breach proceedings after notice and hearing. The appeals were allowed and the High Court judgment was set aside. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285770