<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (3) TMI 1838 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285767</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of full disclosure and reliance on expert valuation reports in tax proceedings. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeals filed by both parties, affirming that the mere addition to the tax liability does not automatically warrant the imposition of a penalty.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 25 Jan 2020 08:34:37 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601434" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (3) TMI 1838 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285767</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the Tribunal&#039;s decision to delete the penalty imposed under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act, emphasizing the importance of full disclosure and reliance on expert valuation reports in tax proceedings. The Court dismissed the Tax Appeals filed by both parties, affirming that the mere addition to the tax liability does not automatically warrant the imposition of a penalty.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285767</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>