<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (12) TMI 35 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21141</link>
    <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, interpreting that the ceiling of Rs. 72,000 under the proviso to section 40A(5)(a) applies to employee-directors, not the limit under clause (c), based on a prior judgment in a similar case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 13:04:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60140" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (12) TMI 35 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21141</link>
      <description>The High Court of Bombay ruled in favor of the assessee, interpreting that the ceiling of Rs. 72,000 under the proviso to section 40A(5)(a) applies to employee-directors, not the limit under clause (c), based on a prior judgment in a similar case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 03 Dec 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21141</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>