<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 925 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391312</link>
    <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A) in a tax case. The Court found that the assessee firm was not obligated to charge interest or remuneration as per the partnership deed, leading to the disallowance by the AO being deemed erroneous. The Court emphasized that the mere inclusion of clauses in the partnership deed did not make them mandatory. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, with no substantial questions of law identified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:12:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601398" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 925 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391312</link>
      <description>The High Court upheld the decision of the Tribunal and CIT(A) in a tax case. The Court found that the assessee firm was not obligated to charge interest or remuneration as per the partnership deed, leading to the disallowance by the AO being deemed erroneous. The Court emphasized that the mere inclusion of clauses in the partnership deed did not make them mandatory. As a result, the Revenue&#039;s appeals were dismissed, with no substantial questions of law identified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391312</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>