<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 923 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391310</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, a Private Limited Company challenging the notice to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment were not valid as the Assessing Officer had already considered all explanations and material during the original assessment. The court granted an interim order maintaining the status quo, allowing the Petitioner to apply for early hearing.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 16:12:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601396" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 923 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391310</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the Petitioner, a Private Limited Company challenging the notice to reopen assessment for Assessment Year 2015-16 under Section 148 of the Income Tax Act. The court found that the reasons for reopening the assessment were not valid as the Assessing Officer had already considered all explanations and material during the original assessment. The court granted an interim order maintaining the status quo, allowing the Petitioner to apply for early hearing.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 15 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391310</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>