<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1968 (5) TMI 63 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757</link>
    <description>Manufacturing tenancies require a six-month notice under the Transfer of Property Act; a shorter notice under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act does not validly determine the tenancy. Registered-post service is not established merely because the postal article was recorded as left; tender and legally sufficient service must be proved. Personal service and affixation also require proof of proper attempts to serve authorised representatives. A certificate of posting creates no conclusive presumption where surrounding facts displace it. Defective notice or service prevents valid termination and undermines ejectment proceedings.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:29:54 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601386" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1968 (5) TMI 63 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757</link>
      <description>Manufacturing tenancies require a six-month notice under the Transfer of Property Act; a shorter notice under the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act does not validly determine the tenancy. Registered-post service is not established merely because the postal article was recorded as left; tender and legally sufficient service must be proved. Personal service and affixation also require proof of proper attempts to serve authorised representatives. A certificate of posting creates no conclusive presumption where surrounding facts displace it. Defective notice or service prevents valid termination and undermines ejectment proceedings.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>