https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757 The court ruled in favor of the tenant, finding that the notice of ejectment was invalid and improperly served. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act and the Transfer of Property Act in determining tenancy rights. The court required the tenant to deposit a specified sum within a timeframe as a condition for pursuing eviction. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the tenant's claim. Judges Mookerjee and Dutt highlighted the significance of valid notice and proper service in landlord-tenant relationships under the relevant laws. en-us Thu, 09 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 15:29:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757 The court ruled in favor of the tenant, finding that the notice of ejectment was invalid and improperly served. The judgment emphasized the importance of complying with the Calcutta Thika Tenancy Act and the Transfer of Property Act in determining tenancy rights. The court required the tenant to deposit a specified sum within a timeframe as a condition for pursuing eviction. Failure to comply would result in the dismissal of the tenant's claim. Judges Mookerjee and Dutt highlighted the significance of valid notice and proper service in landlord-tenant relationships under the relevant laws. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 09 May 1968 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285757