<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 911 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391298</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed on the undisclosed salary income of Rs. 70,000. The decision was based on the absence of incriminating material linking the assessee to the omitted income during section 153A proceedings, rendering the penalty under Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) unjustified.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601370" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 911 - ITAT JAIPUR</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391298</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, directing the deletion of the penalty imposed on the undisclosed salary income of Rs. 70,000. The decision was based on the absence of incriminating material linking the assessee to the omitted income during section 153A proceedings, rendering the penalty under Explanation 5A to section 271(1)(c) unjustified.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391298</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>