<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1993 (1) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21138</link>
    <description>Rules 52 and 54 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act are mandatory in recovery proceedings for sale of attached property, and the sale proclamation must conform to those requirements. The document notes that a Tax Recovery Officer cannot proceed with sale of the attached house without such compliance, and any sale made in breach of these rules would be open to challenge.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 12:46:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1993 (1) TMI 56 - ALLAHABAD High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21138</link>
      <description>Rules 52 and 54 of the Second Schedule to the Income-tax Act are mandatory in recovery proceedings for sale of attached property, and the sale proclamation must conform to those requirements. The document notes that a Tax Recovery Officer cannot proceed with sale of the attached house without such compliance, and any sale made in breach of these rules would be open to challenge.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 11 Jan 1993 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21138</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>