https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391294 Bombay HC stated that a writ of habeas corpus is generally not maintainable where the petitioner's custody is already authorised by a competent magistrate's remand order. Even if the initial arrest is alleged to have been illegal or in breach of constitutional safeguards, that prior irregularity does not by itself justify habeas corpus once valid judicial custody exists. The court noted that the remand order was a judicial act based on relevant material and was not shown to be without jurisdiction or mechanical. The proper remedy in such circumstances is to seek bail before the appropriate court. en-us Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:44:46 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391294 Bombay HC stated that a writ of habeas corpus is generally not maintainable where the petitioner's custody is already authorised by a competent magistrate's remand order. Even if the initial arrest is alleged to have been illegal or in breach of constitutional safeguards, that prior irregularity does not by itself justify habeas corpus once valid judicial custody exists. The court noted that the remand order was a judicial act based on relevant material and was not shown to be without jurisdiction or mechanical. The proper remedy in such circumstances is to seek bail before the appropriate court. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391294