<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 893 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391280</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings on valuation, inter-connected undertakings, and compliance with Rule 10 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The decision stressed the need for thorough evidence to establish inter-connection for accurate goods valuation under the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the importance of proper investigation in such matters.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 12:04:51 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601339" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 893 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391280</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, upholding the Adjudicating Authority&#039;s findings on valuation, inter-connected undertakings, and compliance with Rule 10 of the Central Excise Valuation Rules, 2000. The decision stressed the need for thorough evidence to establish inter-connection for accurate goods valuation under the Central Excise Act, emphasizing the importance of proper investigation in such matters.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 18 Sep 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391280</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>