https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391275 The court decided not to reopen the issue decided in a previous judgment regarding the interpretation of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 70 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The court directed the Commissioner to decide the revision petition on its merits without further pre-deposit from the petitioner. No recoveries were to be made during the pendency of the petition, and the Commissioner was instructed to dispose of the petition within three months. The petitioner was asked to cooperate for an early hearing. The petition was disposed of, clarifying the pre-deposit requirement and providing specific handling directions for the case. en-us Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 11:50:40 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391275 The court decided not to reopen the issue decided in a previous judgment regarding the interpretation of the pre-deposit requirement under Section 70 of the Tripura Value Added Tax Act, 2004. The court directed the Commissioner to decide the revision petition on its merits without further pre-deposit from the petitioner. No recoveries were to be made during the pendency of the petition, and the Commissioner was instructed to dispose of the petition within three months. The petitioner was asked to cooperate for an early hearing. The petition was disposed of, clarifying the pre-deposit requirement and providing specific handling directions for the case. Case-Laws VAT and Sales Tax Mon, 09 Dec 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391275