<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 884 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391271</link>
    <description>The High Court, following a settlement between the parties, compounded the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the case of Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., the court acquitted the accused of the charge under Section 138, quashed the lower courts&#039; judgments, and ordered the release of the compensation amount deposited with the trial court in favor of the complainant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:39:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601324" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 884 - HIMACHAL PRADESH HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391271</link>
      <description>The High Court, following a settlement between the parties, compounded the offence under Section 147 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. Relying on the case of Damodar S. Prabhu v. Sayed Babalal H., the court acquitted the accused of the charge under Section 138, quashed the lower courts&#039; judgments, and ordered the release of the compensation amount deposited with the trial court in favor of the complainant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391271</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>