https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391270 The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the presumption in favor of the complainant regarding the dishonored cheque, noting the lack of convincing rebuttal evidence by the accused. The court found the accused's reliance on documents insufficient and highlighted his actions indicating involvement in issuing the cheque. Consequently, the accused was directed to appear for sentencing on a specified date. en-us Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:38:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391270 The High Court allowed the appeal, set aside the acquittal, and convicted the accused under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act. The court emphasized the presumption in favor of the complainant regarding the dishonored cheque, noting the lack of convincing rebuttal evidence by the accused. The court found the accused's reliance on documents insufficient and highlighted his actions indicating involvement in issuing the cheque. Consequently, the accused was directed to appear for sentencing on a specified date. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391270