<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (2) TMI 1773 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285733</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The Tribunal also ruled that the proviso to Section 68 was not applicable for the relevant assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601317" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (2) TMI 1773 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285733</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to delete the addition made under Section 68 of the Income Tax Act, finding that the assessee had proven the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The Tribunal also ruled that the proviso to Section 68 was not applicable for the relevant assessment year, leading to the dismissal of the revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285733</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>