<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (1) TMI 1700 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285732</link>
    <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 54F back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination, emphasizing the need to verify compliance with the statutory conditions. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C, citing precedent, and dismissed the challenge to the initiation of penalty proceedings as premature. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing a liberal interpretation of Section 54F while ensuring adherence to its requirements.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 24 Jan 2020 08:35:39 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601316" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (1) TMI 1700 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285732</link>
      <description>The Tribunal remitted the issue of disallowance of deduction under Section 54F back to the Assessing Officer for re-examination, emphasizing the need to verify compliance with the statutory conditions. The Tribunal upheld the charging of interest under Sections 234B and 234C, citing precedent, and dismissed the challenge to the initiation of penalty proceedings as premature. The appeal was allowed for statistical purposes, stressing a liberal interpretation of Section 54F while ensuring adherence to its requirements.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 02 Jan 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285732</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>