https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285726 The court held that Rai Bahadur Bansidhar Dhandhania, Dwarkaprasad Dhandhania, and Kedarnath Dhandhania must be deemed to continue as a Hindu undivided family due to the absence of a complete partition. Additionally, the business of Harchandrai Anandram was considered a partnership with Rai Bahadur Bansidhar Dhandhania, Dwarka Prasad Dhandhania, and Kedarnath Dhandhania. Each party will bear their own costs, and the Commissioner will refund the sum of Rs. 100 deposited by the assessee as costs of the reference. en-us Mon, 08 Nov 1943 00:00:00 +0630 Thu, 23 Jan 2020 15:15:47 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285726 The court held that Rai Bahadur Bansidhar Dhandhania, Dwarkaprasad Dhandhania, and Kedarnath Dhandhania must be deemed to continue as a Hindu undivided family due to the absence of a complete partition. Additionally, the business of Harchandrai Anandram was considered a partnership with Rai Bahadur Bansidhar Dhandhania, Dwarka Prasad Dhandhania, and Kedarnath Dhandhania. Each party will bear their own costs, and the Commissioner will refund the sum of Rs. 100 deposited by the assessee as costs of the reference. Case-Laws Income Tax Mon, 08 Nov 1943 00:00:00 +0630 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285726