<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2013 (3) TMI 838 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285721</link>
    <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions to allow various expenditures, including those for FCCB, bank charges, development expenses, and provision for pending labor demand, were upheld. The disallowance of premium on redemption of FCCB was also overturned. However, the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was contested. The challenge focused on the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of relevant legal provisions. The allowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) for specific units despite non-fulfillment of certain conditions was also disputed. The case primarily revolved around the treatment of different expenses and deductions under the tax laws.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 14:17:29 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601252" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2013 (3) TMI 838 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285721</link>
      <description>The Tribunal&#039;s decisions to allow various expenditures, including those for FCCB, bank charges, development expenses, and provision for pending labor demand, were upheld. The disallowance of premium on redemption of FCCB was also overturned. However, the Tribunal&#039;s ruling on disallowance u/s 40(a)(ia) was contested. The challenge focused on the Tribunal&#039;s interpretation of relevant legal provisions. The allowance of weighted deduction u/s 35(2AB) for specific units despite non-fulfillment of certain conditions was also disputed. The case primarily revolved around the treatment of different expenses and deductions under the tax laws.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 2013 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285721</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>