<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 864 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391251</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, holding the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2005-2006 as invalid and bad in law. The Tribunal found no new factual material discovered during reassessment, concluding that the assessee had disclosed all primary facts during the original assessment. As such, the proviso to Section 147 was deemed applicable in favor of the Assessee, leading to the quashing of the reopening of the assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 17 Feb 2020 17:11:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601248" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 864 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391251</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the Assessee&#039;s appeal, holding the reopening of the assessment under section 147 of the I.T. Act, 1961 for A.Y. 2005-2006 as invalid and bad in law. The Tribunal found no new factual material discovered during reassessment, concluding that the assessee had disclosed all primary facts during the original assessment. As such, the proviso to Section 147 was deemed applicable in favor of the Assessee, leading to the quashing of the reopening of the assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391251</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>