<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 858 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391245</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting various disallowances and additions. It held that the AO&#039;s actions were not in line with legal principles and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper transaction characterization and satisfaction recording before disallowances. Notably, disallowances under Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) were found unsustainable and ordered to be deleted, along with other additions on interest and foreign travel expenses.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:57:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601240" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 858 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391245</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partly allowed the appeal, deleting various disallowances and additions. It held that the AO&#039;s actions were not in line with legal principles and precedents. The Tribunal emphasized the need for proper transaction characterization and satisfaction recording before disallowances. Notably, disallowances under Section 14A and Section 36(1)(iii) were found unsustainable and ordered to be deleted, along with other additions on interest and foreign travel expenses.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 17 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391245</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>