<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (9) TMI 39 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</link>
    <description>Failure to communicate Appellate Tribunal orders in the prescribed manner prevents commencement of the statutory limitation for filing an application under the Income-tax scheme; where the Tribunal&#039;s endorsed forwarding was not complied with and the registered letter reached a third party, the assessees did not receive the order and the limitation period did not begin. The Tribunal&#039;s time-bar conclusion based on assumed proper service is vitiated, condonation is irrelevant where service has not occurred as required, and the application must be treated as filed within time and decided on merits; costs were awarded.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (9) TMI 39 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</link>
      <description>Failure to communicate Appellate Tribunal orders in the prescribed manner prevents commencement of the statutory limitation for filing an application under the Income-tax scheme; where the Tribunal&#039;s endorsed forwarding was not complied with and the registered letter reached a third party, the assessees did not receive the order and the limitation period did not begin. The Tribunal&#039;s time-bar conclusion based on assumed proper service is vitiated, condonation is irrelevant where service has not occurred as required, and the application must be treated as filed within time and decided on merits; costs were awarded.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>