<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1954 (9) TMI 39 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</link>
    <description>An application under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act was not barred by limitation because the statutory period of sixty days begins only on lawful service of notice of the Tribunal&#039;s order. The statutory scheme under section 33(4), rule 34, and section 63 required communication of the order to the assessee in the manner prescribed by law. Communication to the assessee&#039;s representative, or to a person other than the assessee, did not satisfy that requirement. As no valid service was effected, the sixty-day period never started to run, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the application was time-barred was erroneous.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:43:30 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601239" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1954 (9) TMI 39 - NAGPUR HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</link>
      <description>An application under section 66(1) of the Income-tax Act was not barred by limitation because the statutory period of sixty days begins only on lawful service of notice of the Tribunal&#039;s order. The statutory scheme under section 33(4), rule 34, and section 63 required communication of the order to the assessee in the manner prescribed by law. Communication to the assessee&#039;s representative, or to a person other than the assessee, did not satisfy that requirement. As no valid service was effected, the sixty-day period never started to run, and the Tribunal&#039;s view that the application was time-barred was erroneous.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 09 Sep 1954 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285720</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>