<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 853 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391240</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4,48,350 under Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that the valuation difference fell within the 15% tolerance limit based on judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal emphasized that prior to the Finance Act, 2018 amendment, no tolerance limit applied to Section 43CA, and statutory provisions should be strictly interpreted. The appeal was dismissed on 29.11.2019, affirming the addition as justified under the Act.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 12:06:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601230" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 853 - ITAT MUMBAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391240</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the addition of Rs. 4,48,350 under Section 43CA of the Income Tax Act, rejecting the assessee&#039;s argument that the valuation difference fell within the 15% tolerance limit based on judicial pronouncements. The Tribunal emphasized that prior to the Finance Act, 2018 amendment, no tolerance limit applied to Section 43CA, and statutory provisions should be strictly interpreted. The appeal was dismissed on 29.11.2019, affirming the addition as justified under the Act.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391240</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>