https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285718 The court held that property of an individual who is not the proclaimed person cannot be attached under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court emphasized that the property attached must belong to the accused and not to any other individual. The court directed the release of seized properties to the petitioner and ordered compensation of Rs. 10,000 to be paid by the former Officer-in-charge for failing to furnish the inventory of seized articles to the Magistrate, holding him personally liable. The court set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order and mandated the release of seized articles to the petitioner within one week. en-us Wed, 27 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2020 11:52:56 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285718 The court held that property of an individual who is not the proclaimed person cannot be attached under Section 82 of the Code of Criminal Procedure. The court emphasized that the property attached must belong to the accused and not to any other individual. The court directed the release of seized properties to the petitioner and ordered compensation of Rs. 10,000 to be paid by the former Officer-in-charge for failing to furnish the inventory of seized articles to the Magistrate, holding him personally liable. The court set aside the Chief Judicial Magistrate's order and mandated the release of seized articles to the petitioner within one week. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 27 Sep 1995 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285718