https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714 A fresh detention order under COFEPOSA could not be made on the same grounds after revocation of the earlier order where the revocation fell outside Section 11(1) of the Act. The HC held that Section 11(2) permits a further detention order only in the situations covered by Section 11(1), so a revocation under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act did not authorise renewed detention. It also held that release following an adverse Advisory Board opinion under Section 8(f), read with Article 22(4), is a mandatory constitutional safeguard, and a second detention on identical material would defeat that protection. The challenge succeeded and immediate release was directed. en-us Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:09:33 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714 A fresh detention order under COFEPOSA could not be made on the same grounds after revocation of the earlier order where the revocation fell outside Section 11(1) of the Act. The HC held that Section 11(2) permits a further detention order only in the situations covered by Section 11(1), so a revocation under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act did not authorise renewed detention. It also held that release following an adverse Advisory Board opinion under Section 8(f), read with Article 22(4), is a mandatory constitutional safeguard, and a second detention on identical material would defeat that protection. The challenge succeeded and immediate release was directed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714