<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1986 (1) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714</link>
    <description>The court held that a fresh detention order under Section 3 of the COFEPOSA Act cannot be issued after the original order is revoked under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act or Section 8(f) of the COFEPOSA Act unless there are new grounds for detention. Both writ petitions were allowed, and the detenus were ordered to be released immediately.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 10:09:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601224" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1986 (1) TMI 384 - BOMBAY HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714</link>
      <description>The court held that a fresh detention order under Section 3 of the COFEPOSA Act cannot be issued after the original order is revoked under Section 21 of the General Clauses Act or Section 8(f) of the COFEPOSA Act unless there are new grounds for detention. Both writ petitions were allowed, and the detenus were ordered to be released immediately.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 22 Jan 1986 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285714</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>