<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 844 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391231</link>
    <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of the refund claim, emphasizing that eligibility of CENVAT credit cannot be questioned during refund adjudication. It held that subsequent debits to the CENVAT account did not affect the appellant&#039;s right to claim a refund. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and directed the authorities to process the refund with interest in accordance with statutory provisions.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 08:37:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601209" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 844 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391231</link>
      <description>The Tribunal overturned the rejection of the refund claim, emphasizing that eligibility of CENVAT credit cannot be questioned during refund adjudication. It held that subsequent debits to the CENVAT account did not affect the appellant&#039;s right to claim a refund. The Tribunal referred to legal precedents and directed the authorities to process the refund with interest in accordance with statutory provisions.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 02 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391231</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>