<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391225</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the Assessee, directing the AO to reconsider the depreciation claim on tangible assets based on proper verification of purchase bills, payments, and valuation reports, and to grant the Assessee an opportunity for cross-examination of statements recorded during the survey. The issues related to the levy of interest and initiation of penalty were deemed consequential and not separately adjudicated.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2020 09:52:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601193" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 838 - ITAT AHMEDABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391225</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed all four appeals filed by the Assessee, directing the AO to reconsider the depreciation claim on tangible assets based on proper verification of purchase bills, payments, and valuation reports, and to grant the Assessee an opportunity for cross-examination of statements recorded during the survey. The issues related to the levy of interest and initiation of penalty were deemed consequential and not separately adjudicated.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391225</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>