<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1962 (4) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699</link>
    <description>The court held that the respondents&#039; use of the trade mark &quot;Perry&#039;s&quot; for confectionery products infringed the appellants&#039; trade mark &quot;Parry&#039;s.&quot; An injunction was issued restraining the respondents from using the mark for confectionery but allowed its use for biscuits. The court emphasized the visual and phonetic similarity between the marks, leading to potential confusion among consumers. The agreement between the parties restricted the use of the mark to biscuits only, not confectionery. The court clarified that registration under the Indian Trade Marks Act confers exclusive rights only for registered goods. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:46:44 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601182" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1962 (4) TMI 130 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699</link>
      <description>The court held that the respondents&#039; use of the trade mark &quot;Perry&#039;s&quot; for confectionery products infringed the appellants&#039; trade mark &quot;Parry&#039;s.&quot; An injunction was issued restraining the respondents from using the mark for confectionery but allowed its use for biscuits. The court emphasized the visual and phonetic similarity between the marks, leading to potential confusion among consumers. The agreement between the parties restricted the use of the mark to biscuits only, not confectionery. The court clarified that registration under the Indian Trade Marks Act confers exclusive rights only for registered goods. The appeal was allowed in favor of the appellants with costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 10 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>