https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699 A registered trade mark is protected only for the specific goods covered by the registration, and use of a deceptively similar mark on confectionery was treated as infringing where "Perry's" closely resembled "Parry's" in sound and appearance and was likely to confuse purchasers. Registration of the mark for biscuits in the same class did not extend protection to confectionery, which was treated as a distinct good. The own-name defence also failed because the impugned use was not accepted as bona fide personal-name use. Injunction relief was therefore available against use on confectionery, while use for biscuits remained permissible. en-us Tue, 10 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 18:46:44 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699 A registered trade mark is protected only for the specific goods covered by the registration, and use of a deceptively similar mark on confectionery was treated as infringing where "Perry's" closely resembled "Parry's" in sound and appearance and was likely to confuse purchasers. Registration of the mark for biscuits in the same class did not extend protection to confectionery, which was treated as a distinct good. The own-name defence also failed because the impugned use was not accepted as bona fide personal-name use. Injunction relief was therefore available against use on confectionery, while use for biscuits remained permissible. Case-Laws Indian Laws Tue, 10 Apr 1962 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285699