<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1992 (7) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21118</link>
    <description>The first proviso to section 43B of the Income-tax Act applied to assessment year 1986-87, and a sales tax liability paid within the time allowed under the relevant sales tax law could not be disallowed merely because payment was not made within the accounting year. The Calcutta HC followed its earlier settled interpretation of section 43B and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance, answering the reference in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 20 Nov 2009 11:41:42 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=60117" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1992 (7) TMI 44 - CALCUTTA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21118</link>
      <description>The first proviso to section 43B of the Income-tax Act applied to assessment year 1986-87, and a sales tax liability paid within the time allowed under the relevant sales tax law could not be disallowed merely because payment was not made within the accounting year. The Calcutta HC followed its earlier settled interpretation of section 43B and upheld the Tribunal&#039;s deletion of the disallowance, answering the reference in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jul 1992 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=21118</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>