https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695 Claims for refund and related amounts arising from a stockist-distributor contract are enforceable only if the suing firm is entitled to sue; where the firm is unregistered, Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act bars enforcement of contractual rights by the firm or its partners, and the plaint is liable to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. A separate declaration that encashed cheques are null and void is also not maintainable where the real dispute is monetary recovery from the same transaction and an adequate alternative remedy exists; the declaratory claim therefore fails. en-us Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:56:21 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695 Claims for refund and related amounts arising from a stockist-distributor contract are enforceable only if the suing firm is entitled to sue; where the firm is unregistered, Section 69(2) of the Indian Partnership Act bars enforcement of contractual rights by the firm or its partners, and the plaint is liable to rejection under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. A separate declaration that encashed cheques are null and void is also not maintainable where the real dispute is monetary recovery from the same transaction and an adequate alternative remedy exists; the declaratory claim therefore fails. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695