<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2001 (12) TMI 894 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695</link>
    <description>The court rejected the plaintiff&#039;s suit for declaration and recovery of the amount due to the unregistered status of the partnership firm and the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The judgment emphasized the legal implications of filing suits by unregistered firms and the limitations imposed by relevant provisions of the Partnership Act, resulting in the dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s claims.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 14:56:21 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601165" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2001 (12) TMI 894 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695</link>
      <description>The court rejected the plaintiff&#039;s suit for declaration and recovery of the amount due to the unregistered status of the partnership firm and the application under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The judgment emphasized the legal implications of filing suits by unregistered firms and the limitations imposed by relevant provisions of the Partnership Act, resulting in the dismissal of the plaintiff&#039;s claims.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 19 Dec 2001 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=285695</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>