<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391213</link>
    <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on whether the penalty order under Section 271-D of the Income Tax Act is time-barred as per Section 275. The Court emphasized the importance of examining this issue, even without Cross-objections, as it could affect the validity of the penalty order. This decision ensures a comprehensive assessment of the limitation aspect, underscoring its significance in determining the case&#039;s outcome.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 10:21:41 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601137" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 826 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391213</link>
      <description>The High Court remitted the case back to the Tribunal for a fresh decision on whether the penalty order under Section 271-D of the Income Tax Act is time-barred as per Section 275. The Court emphasized the importance of examining this issue, even without Cross-objections, as it could affect the validity of the penalty order. This decision ensures a comprehensive assessment of the limitation aspect, underscoring its significance in determining the case&#039;s outcome.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391213</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>