<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 820 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391207</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to the lack of clear evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars and the failure to specify the grounds for penalty in the notice. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 09:57:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601126" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 820 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391207</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the penalty under section 271(1)(c) of the Income Tax Act could not be sustained due to the lack of clear evidence of concealment or furnishing inaccurate particulars and the failure to specify the grounds for penalty in the notice. Consequently, the Tribunal directed the deletion of the penalty and allowed the appeal of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 20 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391207</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>