<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 813 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391200</link>
    <description>Delay of 87 days in filing customs appeals was condoned on the reasons stated in the miscellaneous applications, and the condonation applications were allowed. The Revenue then sought withdrawal of its appeals, which was permitted; the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn and the connected stay petitions were disposed of. The order records only these procedural outcomes and does not decide any substantive customs issue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 22 Jan 2020 08:28:33 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=601113" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 813 - CESTAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391200</link>
      <description>Delay of 87 days in filing customs appeals was condoned on the reasons stated in the miscellaneous applications, and the condonation applications were allowed. The Revenue then sought withdrawal of its appeals, which was permitted; the appeals were dismissed as withdrawn and the connected stay petitions were disposed of. The order records only these procedural outcomes and does not decide any substantive customs issue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Jun 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=391200</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>